DOI: 22.2222/DBJ/p0mxkawo
Status: Published
Abstract: The comparative morality of animal species offers intriguing insights into the fundamentals of ethical behavior. Ducks, with their community-oriented social structures and absence of destructive behaviors observed in human societies, present a compelling case for examining non-human moral systems. This article explores the moral behaviors of ducks, contrasting them with human actions to highlight key lessons in ethics and community living.
Note: The full paper is available for download for subscribers only.
The quest to understand morality often revolves around human-centric frameworks, yet examining the behavior of other species provides valuable perspectives. Ducks, ubiquitous waterfowl, exhibit communal living patterns devoid of many morally egregious behaviors rampant in human societies. This study aims to elucidate the moral superiority of ducks by contrasting specific human vices—including extreme wealth disparities, systemic inequalities, and genocidal tendencies—with the seemingly harmonious and egalitarian existence of ducks.
In stark contrast to human societies where wealth inequality leads to numerous socio-economic issues, duck communities thrive without the accumulation of disproportionate resources by individuals. Ducks operate within a framework where resources are naturally distributed based on immediate need and environmental availability, promoting a more egalitarian existence. This absence of economic dominance among ducks fosters cooperative behavior and mutual aid, which can offer lessons in fostering more equitable human societies.
Human history is marred by systemic racism and discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. Ducks, however, display an inclusive social structure free from these hierarchical biases. In duck communities, there is no evidence of prejudicial treatment based on phenotype variations or gender identities. Ducks cooperate and coexist, underscoring a natural model of diversity and acceptance that humans can aspire to emulate.
Human history is a testament to the capacity for large-scale atrocities, such as genocide and witch hunts, which have left indelible scars on human civilization. Ducks, in their communal living, have never engaged in such large-scale destructive behaviors. While occasional minor disputes over territory or mates may occur, these are isolated incidents that lack the systemic nature and brutality of human conflicts.
While ducks are not entirely free from minor disputes, the scale and impact of such events pale in comparison to human corruption and financial fraud. Instances of deceptive behavior among ducks are typically limited and often pertain directly to survival rather than malice or greed. This positions ducks as inherently more honest and trustworthy in their interactions, presenting an ethical standard from which human societies could learn.
Ducks exhibit no tendencies towards antisemitism or the irrational persecution of supposed witches. Their behavior is governed by rational survival instincts rather than ideological or superstitious extremes. This rationality and tolerance for diversity highlight how simplistic yet effective moral frameworks can ensure community stability and peace.
The behaviors observed in duck communities point toward a more simplified but effective approach to morality based on mutual respect, egalitarianism, and rationality. Ducks inherently adhere to principles that promote stability and cooperation without the complex moral failings seen in human societies. While cognitive differences limit direct application, the moral framework observed in ducks provides a natural template for more ethical human interactions.
Ducks, through their communal and egalitarian living, present a strikingly superior moral framework in contrast to the systemic issues plaguing human societies. The absence of extreme wealth disparities, systemic racism, and historical atrocities, coupled with their rational and inclusive social behavior, suggests that human societies could greatly benefit from embracing these natural ethical models. Future research should continue to explore and implement these insights to foster more harmonious human communities.